IF THE DOOR IS STILL NOT UNLOCKED, MAYBE THE KEY IS UNDER THE MAT ?

 The Global Network of Rainbow Catholics Responds to Pope Francis’ Apostolic Exhortation, Amoris Laetitia – The Joy of Love

GNRC logo

Pope Francis’s response to the 2014 & 2015 Synods of Catholic Bishops on Marriage & Family, the Apostolic Exhortation, The Joy of Love , raises more questions than it answers for LGBTQI Catholics, parents and families, globally. Disappointed by the light touch given to same-sex and gender identity concerns in the papal document, published 8 April 2016, the Global Network of Rainbow Catholics welcomes, nevertheless, the fact that the doors of welcome in this Jubilee Year of Mercy have not been slammed shut definitively. However, the GNRC is pleased that Pope Francis offers some clues as to where the key might be found, even if it looks more like it might be under the door-mat!

key under the mat Continue reading

SE LA PORTA NON E’ STATA ANCORA APERTA, FORSE LA CHIAVE E’ SOTTO LO ZERBINO?

Roma, 9 aprile 2016

Cammini di Speranza diffonde il comunicato stampa del Global Network of Rainbow Catholics (di cui è fondatore) sull ’ Esortazione Apostolica di Papa Francesco “ Amoris Laetitia ” – La Gioia dell ’ Amore

GNRC logo

La risposta di Papa Francesco ai Sinodi dei Vescovi cattolici su matrimonio e famiglia del 2014 e 2015, l’Esortazione Apostolica, “Amoris Laetitia” (La gioia dell’Amore), solleva a livello complessivo più domande che risposte per i cattolici LGBTQI, i loro genitori e famiglie.
Delusi dalla trattazione contenuta riservata alle questioni legate all’omosessualità e all’identità di genere dal documento pontificio pubblicato l’8 aprile 2016, le persone del Global Network of Rainbow Catholics apprezzano comunque il fatto che le porte dell’accoglienza, in questo anno giubilare della Misericordia, non sono state chiuse definitivamentee che Papa Francesco offra alcuni indizi su dove possa essere trovata la chiave, anche se sembrerebbe quasi verosimile che potrebbe trovarsi sotto lo zerbino!

key under the mat
Continue reading

SI LA PUERTA AUN NO SE ABRE, ¿PUEDE SER QUE LA LLAVE ESTE BAJO EL FELPUDO?

 La Red Global de Católicos Arcoíris responde a la Exhortación Apostólica del Papa Francisco , Amo ris Laetitia – La Alegría del Amor

GNRC logo

La respuesta del Papa Francisco al Sínodo Extraordinario de Obispos de 2014 y 2015 sobre Matrimonio y Familia, la Exhortación Apostólica La Alegría del Amor , levanta más preguntas de las que responde para los católicos LGBTQI, sus padres y familias, a nivel global. Decepcionados por la liviana mención dada a los asuntos de unión de personas del mismo sexo e identidad de género en el Documento Papal, publicado el 8 de abril de 2016, la Red Global de Católicos Arcoíris recibe gratamente, no obstante, el hecho de que las puertas de bienvenida en este año del Jubileo de la Misericordia no hayan sido definitivamente cerradas de un portazo. Sin embargo, la GNRC agradecería que el Papa Francisco ofrezca algunas pistas sobre dónde encontrar la llave, incluso aunque parecieran estar más bien debajo del felpudo.

key under the mat

El Papa Francisco ha abierto nuevos caminos en la Iglesia para comprometerse pastoralmente con la realidad de vida de sus miembros, incluyendo a toda la gente de Dios LGBTQI. La GNRC recibe positivamente el giro desde una anticuada comprensión teológica, y el énfasis en leyes y regulaciones, hacia estrategias que empoderen a todos aquellos que conducen, a estar al lado de aquellos a quienes se les ha considerado como “irregulares” o inclusive “desordenados” y aprender de ellos. Una pregunta clave ahora es cómo los principios de La Alegría del Amor pueden ser aplicados en los contextos LGBTIQ, tanto los principios referidos al discernimiento personal y eclesial, la primacía de conciencia, el cuidado pastoral respetuoso y basado en la justicia, como aquellos métodos novedosos de hacer teología moral.
La Exhortación refuerza la prioridad en el respeto a la dignidad humana de cada persona, no solo en su rechazo a la discriminación homofóbica y transfóbica, sino también en cualquier forma de agresión o violencia hacia las personas LGBTQI. Estas declaraciones necesitan guiar al Vaticano a un apoyo activo y público para una descriminalización global, como también a la condena de la tortura y pena de muerte en el campo de la orientación sexual e identidad de género, que afecta en algunos países a la comunidad LGBTQI. El Vaticano tiene que ser más firme en su apoyo a los derechos humanos de las personas LGBTQI; y, frente a este accionar público, la GNRC lamenta el argumento sin fundamento, mantenido en la retórica vaticana, respecto a que la ayuda a países pobres continúe siendo condicionada a la implementación del matrimonio igualitario.
Aunque el énfasis en las prioridades del cuidado pastoral es cálidamente recibido, la GNRC no puede ignorar el continuo daño al bienestar espiritual y personal, causado por el uso incierto e inadecuado de lenguaje teológico como el contenido en las expresiones “intrínsecamente maligno” y “objetivamente desordenado”. La GNRC también agradece la ausencia de dicho vocabulario en La Ale gría del Amor pues aquellas categorizaciones contienen posturas prejuiciosas hacía las personas y comunidad LGBTQI, sin olvidar que refuerzan altos niveles de bullying, autoagresión, y suicidio entre jóvenes LGBTQI.
Los católicos LGBTQI, sus padres y familias no pueden continuar siendo tratados como “problemas” que desafían a la Iglesia ampliada, pues deben ser vistos como participes activos en el diálogo al cual el Papa Francisco nos llama a todos, con sus virtudes, para contribuir al bien común. Nosotros, por lo tanto, renovamos nuestro llamado para un estructurado, “proceso de escucha” internacional, en el que la jerarquía de la Iglesia y los teólogos puedan compartir con Católicos LGBTQI, sus padres, y gente joven, incluyendo los hijos de familias del mismo sexo, junto con un diverso grupo de expertos en las ciencias humanas. Dicho proceso permitirá desarrollar, a todo el pueblo de Dios, su propia visión, lenguaje y enseñanza de la sexualidad humana e identidad de género.
Una respuesta más detallada a La Alegría del Amor puede ser encontrada en el sitio Web de la GNRC
NOTA La Red Global de Católicos Arcoíris (GNRC) se conforma de organizaciones e individuos que trabajan por el cuidado pastoral y justicia para personas lesbianas, gays, bisexuales, transexuales, queer, e interesexules (LGBTQI) y sus familias. La red trabaja por la inclusión, dignidad e igualdad de esta comunidad en la Iglesia Católica Romana y la sociedad en general. La GNRC fue fundada en octubre del 2015 en la conferencia de Roma, “Los Caminos del Amor”, con 80 participantes de 30 países. A la fecha la GNRC representa a 25 grupos de católicos LGTBQI, sus familias y amigos de todos los continentes.

GNRC Response to “Amoris Laetitia”

 A RESPONSE FROM THE GLOBAL NETWORK OF RAINBOW CATHOLICS TO POPE FRANCIS’ APOSTOLIC EXHORTATION AMORIS LAETITIA (THE JOY OF LOVE)

09.04.2016
The post-synodal Apostolic Exhortation of Pope Francis with the title “Amoris Laetitia” opens up new perspectives for the pastoral work of the Catholic Church, drawing both from earlier teachings of the Church on family life and marriage, and also from a pragmatic and more ‘grounded’ appreciation of the  real lived-experiences of family life. Nonetheless, we note that these perspectives are not yet applied with full consequence when it comes to persons of different gender and/or sexual orientation (LGBTQI persons).

Welcoming new pastoral approaches

We are supportive of the more positive stance taken by Francis to move away from an inflexible attachment to doctrine and towards a more humane approach to discipleship grounded in true charity, which ‘is always unmerited, unconditional and gratuitous’ (Art. 296). We welcome pastoral approaches that avoid judgements that do not take into account ‘the complexity of various situations’ (Art. 296) but rather aim to reach out to everyone to find their proper way of being in the Church (Art. 297). It is indeed positive that Francis reiterates a point he made in the Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium (2013) that the Church has often acted as ‘arbiters of grace rather than its facilitators’ and affirms that rather than being a tollhouse, the Church is ‘the house of  the Father, where there is a place for everyone, with all their problems’ (Art. 310).

We appreciate that the Pope empowers the local churches to find fitting interpretations of pastoral, moral and doctrinal issues (Art. 3). This will give more flexibility and freedom to the dioceses to make practical decisions, which is important when it comes to pastoral work with LGBTQI people and their families.

The document gives fresh guidance on pastoral discernment which emphasizes that pastors need to respect the conscience of the person, take the individual situation into consideration and follow the ‘logic of pastoral mercy’ (Art. 307). It rejects an understanding of “natural law” as ‘an already established set of rules’ which was a traditional tool in anti-homosexual argumentation. Instead, it reinterprets natural law as ‘a source of objective inspiration for the deeply personal process of making decisions’ (Art. 305). Indeed, ‘those who manifest a homosexual orientation’ should be assisted through ‘respectful pastoral guidance’ to be able ‘to  understand and fully carry out God’s will in their lives’ (Art. 305).

Sex Education

Francis reiterates the teachings of the Second Vatican Council on the need of ’a positive and prudent sex education’, noting the challenges of sex education ‘in an age when sexuality tends to be trivialised and impoverished’ (Art. 280). Francis notes that ‘the sexual urge can be directed through a process of growth in self-knowledge and self-control capable of  nurturing valuable capacities for joy and for loving encounter’ (Art. 280). The Pope also calls for a sex education that includes ‘respect and appreciation for differences’ and an appreciation of one’s body that is necessary for one’s encounter with others different from oneself (Art. 285). We hope that this statement can make a difference in the lives of many LGBTQI adolescents who often face insensitivity in their schools and whose difference is not always acknowledged and embraced healthily, often by members of the Church.     

Families with LGBTI persons

When the Pope speaks explicitly about families that ‘include persons who experience same-sex attraction’ (Art. 250), he affirms the dignity of every human person regardless of sexual orientation. He asks for respect and avoidance of aggression and violence. Yet, Pope Francis’ one statement discussing pastoral care to families with lesbian and gay members is included in a section entitled “Casting Light on Crises, Worries and Difficulties”.  Such a classification reveals an assumption that LGBTQI topics are simply problems to be surmounted, and it does not recognize the giftedness and grace that occur when a family accepts and loves its LGBTQI family members.

We welcome the document’s acknowledgement of the need for respectful pastoral care. We know from our experience of working with LGBTQI Catholic persons, the most respectful and effective forms of pastoral care are the ones that are done in consultation with LGBTQI persons that respects their lived realities and honours their voices, aspirations as well as celebrates their gifts and dignity in the community of the faithful.

The problem of language

That the document uses ‘homosexual orientation’ (in some versions) to refer to persons who experience same-sex attraction is already worth noting, considering that in earlier pronouncements of the Church on this subject, it always used to use the derogatory expression ‘homosexual tendencies’.

This does not mean that the Church has overcome the basic problems of language, for even reductive expressions as ‘same-sex attractions’ are still simplistic and unsatisfactory. The GNRC cannot ignore the continuing harm to spiritual and personal well-being caused by the use of untrue and inaccurate theological language such as ‘intrinsically evil’ and ‘objectively disordered’. The GNRC welcomes the lack of such vocabulary in The Joy of Love because such categories foster prejudicial stances towards LGBTQI persons and communities, not least in contributing to higher-than-average rates of bullying, self-harm, and suicide among LGBTQI younger people..

Homosexual unions

We are disappointed that Francis reiterates the Church’s long-held position that homosexual unions cannot be considered ‘in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God’s plan for marriage and family’ (Art. 251, 52) and seems not to offer much scope for dialogue and theological exploration in these new ‘signs of the times’. The lived experiences of several same-sex couples all over the world and who are part of the Catholic faithful should encourage the Church to discern these and other expressions of LGBTQI existence, rather than continue making categorical statements that close the door to dialogue.

It is worth considering that Francis is concerned about the great poverty of contemporary culture, which is evident in the loneliness of individuals, arising from the absence of God in a person’s life and the fragility of relationships. He notes that the State has the responsibility to pass laws and create work to ensure that young people can realise their plan of forming a family (Art. 43). The Second Vatican Council also echoes this perspective when stating that ‘such a love, bringing together the human and the divine, leads the partners to a free and mutual self-giving, experienced in tenderness and action, and permeating their entire lives’ (Art. 125). Yet, this seems only to apply to heterosexual relationships, and nowhere in this Apostolic Exhortation is there a tacit acknowledgement that this may also be true to same-sex relationships. We hope that the Church will apply the same logic that it applies to other irregular unions to same-sex relationships as well and will ‘not disregard the constructive elements in those situations which do not yet or no longer correspond to her teaching on marriage’ (Art. 292).

Condemnations of violence against LGBTI people are not enough

We also note with concern that Francis reiterated positions repeated in the Synodal documents that deem unacceptable that international aid be tied with the introduction of laws that establish same-sex marriage (Art. 251), while not being vocal enough in its denunciation of legal violence in several countries in the world towards LGBTQI people who are criminalised for being who they are. The apostolic exhortation acknowledges that LGBTI persons experience aggression and violence, however it does not recommend any forms of remedy beyond avoidance.

In a global context where LGBTQI persons around the world continue to face various forms of aggression and violence that manifests in structural, physical, cultural, spiritual and psychological violence, this response is inadequate. Where criminalisation, extrajudicial abuse, capital punishment, torture, aversion therapy, moral vilification and the denial of human rights of LGBTQI persons is still prevalent, we urge the leaders of our church to urgently call upon the end of all forms of aggression and violence against LGBTQI persons and their families. We urge the Holy See to make an explicit statement condemning laws which criminalize LGBTQI persons. Such a statement would be entirely consistent with the principles that the pope has made in this document and which already existed in church teaching.

Understanding Gender and ‘Gender ideology’

We also note that Francis’ framing of the discourse on the ‘ideology of gender’ is rooted in the understanding of gender as a biological constant and that the gender ideology purportedly reduces gender identity to ‘the choice of the individual, one which can also change over time’ (Art. 56). One appreciates the Church’s concern for any relativistic reductionism of gender-related issues. However, we urge the Church not to trivialise the lived experiences of transgendered persons, for whom choosing a gender identity that is different from their biological sex is not a matter of choosing a different gender, but rather allowing them to be true to their ‘truth’, as they experience it in their innermost sense of being.

At the same time, we welcome Francis’ acknowledgement that masculinity and femininity are not rigid categories and that the social constructions of gender should be rather fluid, thus not excluding individuals from professions, arts or leadership on the basis of one’s gender (Art. 286).   

The need for further discernment on LGBTI issues

Whilst the document promotes a dialogical approach for the pastoral work of the church, the document has also demonstrated a lack of scientific understanding of LGBTQI lives as well as the often harsh realities faced both within and outside of the church.

We invite Pope Francis together with fellow Synod Fathers to set-up a listening process that seeks for wide consultation with LGBTQI persons and their families as well as scholars, scientists and professionals in this area of health, psychology and other social sciences. We hope that such a process can inform the Church as it discerns its understanding of LGBTQI persons and in due course clarify and revise its vision, doctrine and language on these persons and God’s plan for them.

Conclusion

We look with interest at Francis’ gentle encouragement for dialogue within the family, rooted in the recognition that different persons within the family have different standpoints, concerns, abilities and insights. He continues to acknowledge that every person has his/her truth and deep concerns and he urges for sensitivity and empathy with the other by putting ‘ourselves in their shoes and try to peer into their hearts, to perceive their deepest concerns and to take them as a point of  departure for further dialogue’ (Art. 138).

While we appreciate this understanding of dialogue, we also invite the Church to embrace this type of dialogue herself and adopt such attitudes towards the several LGBTQI persons within the Catholic Church who also want to share with the Church their own lived faith in their sexual and gender diversity. We urge Pope Francis to apply his own advice to families:

to free ourselves from feeling that we all have to be alike. A certain astuteness is also needed to prevent the appearance of “static” that can interfere with the process of  dialogue’ (Art 139).

“Une nouvelle ère pour la pastorale inclusive des personnes LGBT commence avec ce Synode:”

Le Réseau Mondial des Catholiques Arc-en-ciel (Global Network of Rainbow Catholics) prend note du Rapport Final du Synode de 2015 des évêques sur La Vocation et la Mission de la Famille dans l’Église et dans le Monde Contemporain. Nous reconnaissons que le document que les évêques ont soumis au Pape François n’est qu’une étape dans le processus du Synode et qu’il attend une réponse et une réflexion plus complètes de la part du Souverain Pontife selon un mode qu’il choisira.

GNRC logo

Nous sommes encouragés par le Discours de Clôture du Pape au Synode, surtout dans son commentaire selon lequel “il s’agissait de dévoiler ces cœurs fermés, qui se cachent souvent même à l’intérieur de l’enseignement ou des bonnes intentions de l’Église, en vue d’occuper la chaire de Moïse et juger, parfois avec superbe et superficialité, des cas difficiles et des familles blessées… Il s’agissait d’ouvrir des horizons plus larges, en s’élevant au-dessus des théories du complot et des vues à œillères, pour défendre et répandre la liberté des enfants de Dieu, et pour transmettre la beauté de la Nouveauté Chrétienne, parfois encore encroûtée dans un langage archaïque ou tout simplement incompréhensible.”

Il est clair que les évêques n’ont pu atteindre un consensus plus positif au sujet de l’insuffisance de la terminologie qui a servi jusqu’à présent pour décrire une variante d’orientation sexuelle. Néanmoins, nous voyons clairement dans le Rapport Final du Synode (Paragraphe 76) le début d’une nouvelle ère de la pastorale inclusive pour et avec les personnes LGBT, et leurs familles, qui, nous l’espérons, sera mise en œuvre par des diocèses partout dans le monde. Puisqu’il y est dit explicitement: ‘une attention spécifique doit être portée vers les familles ayant un membre avec des tendances homosexuelles’, il n’y a donc plus de raison pour ne pas inclure les couples de même sexe eux-mêmes, aussi bien que les enfants ayant des parents de même sexe, dans un tel projet pastoral.

Nous regrettons l’insinuation que l’intérêt de l’enfant, dans des situations d’adoption ou de placement, nécessite obligatoirement comme parents de substitution des couples de sexe opposé. Une telle assertion est en contradiction flagrante avec une masse considérable de recherche en sciences sociales et elle dénigre la générosité des couples gays et lesbiennes, comme celle de parents isolés, qui acceptent de s’occuper d’enfants non désirés. (Paragraphe 65) Il est également regrettable que le Rapport Final prête une certaine crédibilité au terme, ‘idéologie du genre’, forgé sans aucun soutien scientifique, par ceux qui cherchent une excuse pour ne pas écouter  les réalités des vies des personnes LGBT, de leurs parents et familles, ni leur répondre de manière pastorale (Paragraphe 8).

Nous rejetons avec force l’accusation sans fondement que l’aide financière aux pays pauvres est conditionnée à l’introduction de lois établissant le mariage entre personnes de même sexe (Paragraphe 76), et nous sommes consternés par l’absence de toute condamnation de la criminalisation, de la torture et de la peine de mort infligées aux personnes LGBT dans de trop nombreux pays.

Même si le Synode de 2015 n’a pas réussi à se résoudre à développer une déclaration plus forte de l’accueil des personnes LGBT, nous apprécions les demandes de pardon exprimées au cours du Synode. On a exprimé des demandes de pardon pour le langage nocif et erroné proféré aux personnes LGBT et à leur parents, avec le désir de poursuivre des études et des réflexions plus intenses sur les réalités des relations et de la vie familiale de couples de même sexe. Une porte vers une attention plus sensible aux questions LGBT dans l’Église a été ouverte grâce aux processus synodaux de 2014-2015, en dépit de l’opposition; elle ne pourra plus être fermée. 

Information supplémentaire:

 E-mail: rainbowcatholicsassembly@gmail.com
Sites internet: www.rainbowcatholics.orgwww.waysoflove.wordpress.com
Twitter: #rainbowcatholics  – #waysoflove2015
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/events/1616333885308527/

Contact de presse: Emilio Sturla Furnò +39 3404050400info@emiliosturlafurno.it

Autres Contacts:

Michael Brinkschroeder – michael.brinkschroeder@web.de  /  portable+49 15778814399 – Allemagne
Francis De Bernardo  –  director@newwaysministry.org  / +001 301-277-5674  / portable: + 001 240-432-2489 – USA
Martin Pendergast  –  lgbtcatholicswestminster@gmail.com /  +44 208 986 0807 – Royaume Uni
Andrea Rubera  –  arlock965@yahoo.it  /  +39  335 7510922 – Italie

NOTE:

Un réseau international de 13 associations ayant des membres LGBT catholiques s’est rassemblé pour la première fois à Rome au cours du Synode de 2014. Le Réseau Mondial des Catholiques Arc-en-ciel (Global Network of Rainbow Catholics) a été fondé formellement lors de son Assemblée Inaugurale, les 1-4 octobre, avec des représentants de plus de 30 pays et de tous les continents.

“Uma nova era de cuidado pastoral inclusive às pessoas LGBT vai se iniciar após o Sínodo:”

A Rede Global de Católicos do Arco-Íris assinala o Relatório Final do Sínodo dos Bispos de 2015 sobre A Vocação e a Missão da Família na Igreja e no Mundo Contemporâneo. Reconhecemos que a apresentação pelos Bispos aos Papa Francisco não é mais do que um passo no processo do Sínodo e aguardará uma resposta e reflexão mais abrangentes por parte dele da maneira que ele irá determinar.

GNRC logo

Sentimo-nos encorajados pelo Discurso de Encerramento do Papa ao Sínodo, sobretudo pelos seus comentários de que “também se tratava de se por a nu aqueles corações fechados, que frequentemente se escondem por detrás dos ensinamentos da Igreja ou das boas intenções, a fim de sentar-se na cadeira de Moisés e julgar, às vezes com superioridade e superficialidade, situações difíceis e famílias feridas… Tratava-se de tentar abrir horizontes mais amplos, colocar-se acima das teorias conspiratórias e pontos de vista cegos e inflexíveis, para defender e estender a liberdade dos filhos de Deus e para transmitir a beleza da Boa Nova cristã, por vezes incrustadas numa linguagem que é arcaica ou simplesmente incompreensível.”

É claro que os Bispos não conseguiram chegar a um consenso mais positivo quanto à inadequação da terminologia utilizada anteriormente para descrever as variações da orientação sexual. Contudo, notamos nitidamente no Relatório Final do Sínodo (Parágrafo 76) o início de uma nova era de cuidado pastoral inclusivo para e com as pessoas LGBT, e suas família, algo que se espera será implementado pelas Dioceses no mundo inteiro. Uma vez que é explicitamente mencionado que `se deve dar atenção específica às famílias que tenham um membro com tendências homossexuais’, não há, portanto, mais qualquer razão para não se incluir os próprios casais do mesmo sexo, bem como os filhos e filhas de pais ou mães do mesmo sexo neste enfoque pastoral.

Lamentamos que tenha ficado subentendido que o interesse maior de uma criança, em situação de adoção, necessariamente exige que a mesma seja criada por casais de sexos opostos. Tal afirmação está em franca contradição com consideráveis pesquisas nas ciências sociais e rebaixa a generosidade de casais de lésbicas e gays, bem a de pais e mães solteiros, no cuidado de crianças indesejadas (Parágrafo 65). Também é infeliz que o Relatório Final conceda grande credibilidade ao termo ‘ideologia de gênero’, criado até mesmo sem qualquer comprovação científica, por pessoas que buscam uma desculpa para não ouvir e responder pastoralmente às realidades das vidas de LGBTs, bem como de seus pais e familiares (Parágrafo 8).

Rejeitamos firmemente a acusação sem base de que o socorro financeiro a países pobres esteja condicionado à introdução de leis que instituam o casamento entre pessoas do mesmo sexo (Parágrafo 76) e estamos alarmados com a não rejeição da criminalização, tortura e pena de morte infligida às pessoas LGBT em muitos países.

Embora o Sínodo de 2015 não tenha conseguido produzir uma declaração mais sólida quanto à aceitação de LGBTs, valorizamos os pedidos de desculpas ocorridos durante o encontro. Havia frases que se desculpavam pela linguagem anterior que era imprecisa e nociva ao se dirigir às pessoas LGBT e seus pais juntamente com um desejo de prosseguir com um estudo e reflexão mais intensivos sobre as realidades dos relacionamentos de casais do mesmo sexo e sua vida familiar. Foi aberta uma porta para uma escuta mais atenta e sensível às questões LGBT na Igreja através dos processos sinodais de 2014-2015 as quais, apesar da oposição, não pode mais ser fechada.

Para mais informações:

E-mail: rainbowcatholicsassembly@gmail.com
Websites: www.rainbowcatholics.org www.waysoflove.wordpress.com
Twitter: #rainbowcatholics – #waysoflove2015
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/events/1616333885308527/
Assessoria de Imprensa: Emilio Sturla Furnò +39 3404050400 info@emiliosturlafurno.it

Outros contatos:

Michael Brinkschroeder – michael.brinkschroeder@web.de / mob: +49 15778814399 – Alemanha

Francis De Bernardo – director@newwaysministry.org / +001 301-277-5674 / mob: + 001 240-432-2489 – EUA

Martin Pendergast – lgbtcatholicswestminster@gmail.com / +44 208 986 0807 – Reino Unico

Andrea Rubera – arlock965@yahoo.it / +39 335 7510922 – Itália

OBS:

Uma rede internacional de 13 organizações de/com Católicos LGBT Catholics reuniu-se pela primeira vez durante o Sínodo de 2014 em Roma. Foi substituída pela Rede Global de Católicos do Arco-Íris (RGCAI) que foi formalmente lançada em sua Assembleia de Fundação, de 1 a 4 de outubro de 2015, com representantes de 30 países de todos os continentes.

Tradução para o português por Lula Ramires (lularamires@terra.com.br), do Grupo de Ação Pastoral da Diversidade de São Paulo, Brasil.

“A NEW ERA FOR INCLUSIVE PASTORAL CARE OF LGBT PEOPLE IS GOING TO START AFTER THE SYNOD”

The Global Network of Rainbow Catholics notes the Final Report of the 2015 Synod of Bishops on The Vocation and Mission of the Family in the Church and in the Contemporary World. We recognise that the Bishops’ submission to Pope Francis is but one step in the Synod’s process and awaits a fuller response and reflection from him in the way which he will determine.

GNRC logo

We are encouraged by the Pope’s Closing Address to the Synod, not least his comments that “it was also about laying bare those closed hearts, which frequently hide even behind the Church’s teachings or good intentions, in order to sit in the chair of Moses and judge, sometimes with superiority and superficiality, difficult cases and wounded families … It was about trying to open up broader horizons, rising above conspiracy theories and blinkered viewpoints, so as to defend and spread the freedom of the children of God, and to transmit the beauty of Christian Newness, at times encrusted in a language which is archaic or simply incomprehensible.”

It is clear that the Bishops have been unable to reach a more positive consensus about the inadequacy of previously used terminology to describe variant sexual orientation. However, we see clearly in the Synod’s Final Report (Paragraph 76) the beginning of a new era of inclusive pastoral care for and with LGBT people, and their families, which will hopefully be enacted by Dioceses across the world. Since it is explicitly mentioned that ‘specific attention should be paid to families that have a member with homosexual tendencies’, there is, therefore, no longer any reason not to include same-sex couples themselves, as well as children with same-sex parents in such a pastoral focus.

We regret the implication that the best interests of a child, in adoptive or fostering situations, necessarily requires parenting by opposite sex couples. Such a statement flies in the face of considerable social science research and denigrates the generosity of lesbian and gay couples, as well as single parents, in caring for unwanted children. (Paragraph 65) It is also unfortunate that the Final Report gives serious credibility to the term, ‘gender ideology’, created, even without any scientific evidence, by those who seek to find an excuse not to listen and respond pastorally to the realities of LGBT lives, and those of parents and families (Paragraph 8).

We strongly reject the baseless accusation that financial aid to poor countries is conditional on the introduction of laws that institute marriage between same-sex people, (Paragraph 76) and are dismayed by the failure to reject the criminalisation, torture, and death penalty inflicted on LGBT people in too many countries.

Even though the 2015 Synod did not manage to bring itself to develop a stronger statement of LGBT acceptance, we value the expressions of apology, during the Synod. There was a language of apology for past harmful and inaccurate language addressed to LGBT people and their parents together with a desire to pursue a more intensive study and reflection on the realities of same-sex relationships and family life. The door for a more sensitive attentiveness to LGBT issues in the Church has been opened through the Synodal processes of 2014-2015 and, despite opposition, cannot now be closed.

GNRC responds to the Coming Out of Monsignor Charamsa

 

The Global Network of Rainbow Catholics, meeting in Rome from October 1st , has been working for two years on this project to contribute, through the testimony of the lives and desires of LGBT people, to the internal reflections of the Family Synod which is about to begin..  
With regard to Monsignor Charamsa’s statement, which we read in the press today, the Global Network of Rainbow Catholics would like to make clear that Don Krzysztof is not connected to the conference “Ways of love: Catholics snapshots of meetings with LGBT people and their families “.The full list of conference speakers can be seen from the published program on this website.  
The conference is centered as a matter of fact, on the pastoral work with and for LGBT people, their parents and their families.  
Obviously, in the inclusive spirit of the conference, we will be happy to welcome in the audience any person interested in our work.